🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

1 total messages Started by Mr. Tarkan Yetiser Fri, 18 Dec 1992 01:48
Re: A user's view of IBM's antivirus/2 (OS/2)
#4174
Author: Mr. Tarkan Yetiser
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 01:48
21 lines
1424 bytes
From: bontchev@fbihh.informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Vesselin Bontchev) writes
DC>> didn't want to be told that SETVER.EXE had changed (because they

DC>> or that their boot record had changed (because they
DC>> changed a volume serial number).

>Hey, they should be really power users, if they know how to do that!
>For instance, I don't know how it can be done, without reformatting
>the disk, or using a sector editor... And anybody who is competent
>enough to mess with a sector editor in the boot sector, should not be
>surprised by a message that the said sector has been modified afterwards...

   No, it is not really necessary to be a power user. If you use the
LABEL command with DOS 4.0 or above, it will update the BPB in the
boot sector.  DOS 4.0+ records the volume label at offset 2Bh in the
boot sector. If the integrity checker is using the complete BS when
calculating the signature, then it will issue a warning message.

Regards,
Tarkan Yetiser
VDS Advanced Research Group
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads