Thread View: comp.virus
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Vesselin Bontchev
Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:43
Re: SCAN 95b doesn't find MtE in EXE files (PC)
Author: Vesselin Bontchev
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:43
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:43
23 lines
1617 bytes
1617 bytes
tck@bend.ucsd.edu (Kevin Marcus) writes: > Frisk, that is a very serious problem. It's quite analogous to the > reason why 100% detection of MtE based .COM infectors is necessary. Not quite. It is analogous to the problem for detecting viruses in self-compressed files. My own opinion is that instead of forcing everybody's scanner to be able to handle all the dozen self-compressors available, it would be much better to have the scanner only warn you about the compression and have a separate program that can strip the compression off. However, I agree that if somebody's scanner claims to be able to scan inside compressed executables, it should be able to do so any find all viruses that it normally can find in uncompressed files. Regards, Vesselin - -- Vesselin Vladimirov Bontchev Virus Test Center, University of Hamburg Tel.:+49-40-54715-224, Fax: +49-40-54715-226 Fachbereich Informatik - AGN < PGP 2.0 public key available on request. > Vogt-Koelln-Strasse 30, rm. 107 C e-mail: bontchev@fbihh.informatik.uni-hamburg.de D-2000 Hamburg 54, Germany
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads