🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

1 total messages Started by Vesselin Bontchev Tue, 05 Jan 1993 22:40
Re: Viral Based Distribution System
#4772
Author: Vesselin Bontchev
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 22:40
54 lines
2972 bytes
ygoland@edison.SEAS.UCLA.EDU (The Jester) writes:

> Yes.. I understand. And may I say I STRONGLY disagree with Dr.
> Cohen's definition.

Any human-language definition will be inexact. For an exact definition
you should check his mathematical definition that involves Turing
machines... I think it is explained in his paper "Computational
Aspects of Computer Viruses", published in "Computers & Security". It
is also explained in his Ph.D. thesis (although the paper is better)
and is mentioned (without any explanation, which is rather confusing)
in his booklet "A Short Course on Computer Viruses".

> A program in the login script that checks if you
> have been updated and then updates you is NOT a virus. The program in
> the loader does NOT reproduce itself it reproduces another program
> which is itself NOT a virus.

No, you still do not understand. The "virus" is not just the login
script - it is the whole package. The login script is just the active
segment that seeks for "infectable" machines and transfers the rest of
the "virus code". It is actually a worm, but Cohen's definition does
not seem to make a difference between a virus and a worm.

> loader installs an infected program =) For me the acid test of a virus
> is:Can it reproduce itself?

Correct. So, the copy of the anti-virus package on the server
reproduces itself on each workstation when this workstation tries to
log in. Automatic update. Reproduction. Virus-like behavior.

> Is the login script programming trying to
> run around and find other login scripts or executable files to infect?

Another misunderstanding comes from the fact that most people
distinguish between a "virus" (i.e., something that modifies
executable files) and a "worm" (i.e., something that copies itself as
a whole). While it is useful to make such a distinguishment for
practical reasons, there is no real theoretical difference (e.g., what
"files" do the boot sector viruses infect? How about the companion
viruses? They do not modify anything...).

> No. It doesn't infect anyone! 'Damnit Jim, its not alive!'

Yup, it does. It "infects" the workstation with a copy of the
"virus/worm" - the anti-virus package.

Regards,
Vesselin
- -- 
Vesselin Vladimirov Bontchev          Virus Test Center, University of Hamburg
Tel.:+49-40-54715-224, Fax: +49-40-54715-226      Fachbereich Informatik - AGN
< PGP 2.1 public key available on request. > Vogt-Koelln-Strasse 30, rm. 107 C
e-mail: bontchev@fbihh.informatik.uni-hamburg.de    D-2000 Hamburg 54, Germany
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads