Article View: comp.windows.interviews
Article #1066Basis for RPC?
From: Steinar Bang
Date: Sat, 04 May 1991 10:49
Date: Sat, 04 May 1991 10:49
14 lines
1016 bytes
1016 bytes
I saw some comments to the effect that C++ streams are out as a basis for InterViews RPC (or rather: will be removed when time permits). Instead memory mapped files will be used on the systems that implements them. I can see that this is more efficient than using streams. Two things that bother me, however: - Not all systems will implement memorymapped files. - Net transparancy will be lost. Will you continue to support RPC classes that uses streams (maybe based on ANSI C <stdlib> function calls)? - Steinar
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<STEINARB.91May4124947@fenris.idt.unit.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!wrdis01!nstn.ns.ca!uupsi!sunic!sics.se!ifi!nuug!ugle.unit.no!ugle.unit.no!steinarbShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!wrdis01!nstn.ns.ca!uupsi!sunic!sics.se!ifi!nuug!ugle.unit.no!ugle.unit.no!steinarb From: steinarb@idt.unit.no (Steinar Bang) Newsgroups: comp.windows.interviews Subject: Basis for RPC? Message-ID: <STEINARB.91May4124947@fenris.idt.unit.no> Date: 4 May 91 10:49:47 GMT Sender: news@ugle.unit.no Distribution: comp Organization: Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway Lines: 14