Article View: comp.windows.interviews
Article #1229Re: InterViews not C++
From: Mark Linton
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 22:36
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 22:36
14 lines
1096 bytes
1096 bytes
In article <JPOLITO.92Dec18155929@sysgem1.encore.com>, jpolito@sysgem1.encore.com (Jonathan Polito) writes: |> |> So why do the InterViews developers continue to delete arrays with the |> plain delete syntax? i.e. |> a = new int[10]; |> delete a; |> |> This clearly has undefined behavior in C++, yet InterViews continues |> to rely upon it. Some InterViews code is old enough to run through compilers that didn't understand delete[] (or worse yet, generated bad code). Please send references to any such usages in 3.1 to interviews-bugs, and they will be fixed in the future.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1h5gt0INN815@fido.asd.sgi.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!sgi!fido!marktwain.rad.sgi.com!lintonReferences:
<JPOLITO.92Dec18155929@sysgem1.encore.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!sgi!fido!marktwain.rad.sgi.com!linton From: linton@marktwain.rad.sgi.com (Mark Linton) Newsgroups: comp.windows.interviews Subject: Re: InterViews not C++ Message-ID: <1h5gt0INN815@fido.asd.sgi.com> Date: 21 Dec 92 22:36:16 GMT References: <JPOLITO.92Dec18155929@sysgem1.encore.com> Reply-To: linton@marktwain.rad.sgi.com (Mark Linton) Distribution: comp Organization: sgi Lines: 14 NNTP-Posting-Host: marktwain.rad.sgi.com