Article View: comp.windows.interviews
Article #1654Two questions about the RPC classes
From: Johan Garpendahl
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 23:38
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 23:38
22 lines
1173 bytes
1173 bytes
1) Shouldn't they really be called IPC classes? As far as I can see, they implement Inter Process Communication, rather than Remote Procedure Calls. This is a minor detail though. 2) Isn't overloading on return type illegal? I compiled the RPC classes with g++-2.3.3, and I have had great difficulties with getting the sendplot/plot program to work, mainly because g++ calls the iostream versions of operator<< and operator>> rather than the iostreamb versions. Is this an example of overloading on the return type, which I think is illegal in c++, or is this a bug in g++? Johan -- Johan Garpendahl | Email: garp@isy.liu.se Linkoping University | Phone: +46 - 13 - 28 13 24 Dept. of Electrical Engineering | Fax : +46 - 13 - 13 92 82 S-581 83 LINKOPING // SWEDEN | May the Source be with you.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<garp.726795524@isy>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!liuida!isy!isy!garpShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.windows.interviews Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!liuida!isy!isy!garp From: garp@isy.liu.se (Johan Garpendahl) Subject: Two questions about the RPC classes Message-ID: <garp.726795524@isy> Organization: Dept of EE, University of Linkoping Date: 11 Jan 93 23:38:44 GMT Lines: 22