Article View: comp.windows.interviews
Article #506read and write glyphs
From: Michael Hines
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 19:09
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 19:09
9 lines
889 bytes
889 bytes
I am curious why read(&istream) and write(&ostream) didn't make it into the glyph protocol. Was it because the requirements of applications for saving and restoring state too diverse? I know Unidraw has the concept of a catalog with each object being able to return its type (so one knows what constructor to call when reading it back in). Is it possible/convenient to make use of that mechanism without mixing 2.6 and 3.1. Or should we not be concerned with extensive mixing?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4651@news.duke.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!rutgers!concert!duke!news.duke.edu!neuro.duke.edu!hinesShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!rutgers!concert!duke!news.duke.edu!neuro.duke.edu!hines From: hines@neuro.duke.edu (Michael Hines) Newsgroups: comp.windows.interviews Subject: read and write glyphs Message-ID: <4651@news.duke.edu> Date: 18 Aug 92 19:09:00 GMT Sender: news@news.duke.edu Distribution: usa Lines: 9 Nntp-Posting-Host: timshel.neuro.duke.edu