Article View: comp.windows.interviews
Article #536Re: field editor background
From: Mark Linton
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 16:18
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 16:18
13 lines
1086 bytes
1086 bytes
In article <4766@news.duke.edu>, hines@neuro.duke.edu (Michael Hines) writes:
|>
|> What is the best way to get a different background for field editors?
|> I tried putting
|> *FieldEditor*background: #ffffff
|> in .Xdefaults, /interviews/lib/app_defaults/InterViews
|> and in the PropertyData that gets sent to session
|> but the editors are still red. Apparently
|> smf_kit.c is getting the last word.
Yes, the kit implementations are overriding your defaults (except
for command-line options). {smf,mf}_kit.c should use a lower priority
in the attribute calls (e.g., -10 instead of -5).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<p3oqv70@fido.asd.sgi.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!mips!odin!fido!marktwain.rad.sgi.com!lintonReferences:
<4766@news.duke.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.windows.interviews Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!mips!odin!fido!marktwain.rad.sgi.com!linton From: linton@marktwain.rad.sgi.com (Mark Linton) Subject: Re: field editor background Message-ID: <p3oqv70@fido.asd.sgi.com> Sender: news@fido.asd.sgi.com (Usenet News Admin) Reply-To: linton@marktwain.rad.sgi.com (Mark Linton) Organization: sgi References: <4766@news.duke.edu> Distribution: usa Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 16:18:06 GMT Lines: 13