Article View: comp.windows.interviews
Article #569Re: gcc2.2.2/interviews2.6
From: Mike Stump
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 04:28
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 04:28
6 lines
758 bytes
758 bytes
Yes, should work just fine... I have not tried it, though. In article <RJESSE.92Aug29112043@netcom.Netcom.COM> rjesse@netcom.Netcom.COM (Rick Jesse) writes: >For various reaons, I'm interested in building interviews 2.6. Has >anyone built it with gcc 2.2.2? I'm guessing its not that bad; >but thought I'd check to see if anyone else has tried it.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep02.042820.5909@kithrup.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!kithrup!mrsReferences:
<RJESSE.92Aug29112043@netcom.Netcom.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.windows.interviews Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!kithrup!mrs From: mrs@kithrup.COM (Mike Stump) Subject: Re: gcc2.2.2/interviews2.6 Reply-To: mrs@cygnus.com Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd. Distribution: comp.windows.interviews Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 04:28:20 GMT Message-ID: <1992Sep02.042820.5909@kithrup.COM> References: <RJESSE.92Aug29112043@netcom.Netcom.COM> Lines: 6