Article View: comp.windows.misc
Article #1110Re: One Step... (long!)
From: Bennett Todd
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 1988 17:20
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 1988 17:20
13 lines
1066 bytes
1066 bytes
In article <268@gloom.UUCP> cory@gloom.UUCP (Cory Kempf) writes: >[...] >It does bring up a point... user verification over a network from >untrusted hosts. But that is a thread that is better suited for >comp.security. Everytime I get concerned about user verification over an insecure network from untrusted clients I go back and reread kerberos/doc/dialogue, then I feel better. I think this one is a solved problem, at least in principle; applying it is something that folks will or won't get around to, depending on their perception of their needs. -Bennett
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1179@dukeac.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!mcnc!ecsvax!dukeac!betReferences:
<263@gloom.UUCP> <4498@xenna.Encore.COM> <268@gloom.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!mcnc!ecsvax!dukeac!bet From: bet@dukeac.UUCP (Bennett Todd) Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc,comp.sys.next,comp.sys.mac,comp.cog-eng Subject: Re: One Step... (long!) Message-ID: <1179@dukeac.UUCP> Date: 29 Dec 88 17:20:49 GMT References: <263@gloom.UUCP> <4498@xenna.Encore.COM> <268@gloom.UUCP> Reply-To: bet@dukeac.UUCP (Bennett Todd) Organization: Radiology, Duke Med. Center, Durham, NC Lines: 13