Re: One Step...

Article View: comp.windows.misc

Article #1272

#1272

From: root
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 1989 13:55

13 lines
1093 bytes

In article <69@poppy.warwick.ac.uk> maujt@warwick.ac.uk (Richard J Cox) writes:
>In article <4498@xenna.Encore.COM> bzs@Encore.COM (Barry Shein) writes:
>>Fun note but why do a password challenge when a retinal scan would
>>have been more secure? (please, no disgusting remarks about how to fool
>>a retinal scanner.)
>
>How about using some kind of DNA finger printing? - take a small sample
>of blood (ouch!) and check on this. This would be almost impossible to fool.

Be serious. Besides the invasiveness of the procedure, it's just too slow and
labor intensive using present technology.

Donn S. Fishbein, MD

Technical Details

Message-ID: <151@radar.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!nrl-cmf!ukma!rutgers!bellcore!texbell!killer!radar!root

References: <263@gloom.UUCP> <4498@xenna.Encore.COM> <69@poppy.warwick.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!nrl-cmf!ukma!rutgers!bellcore!texbell!killer!radar!root
From: root@radar.UUCP (root)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc,comp.sys.next,comp.sys.mac,comp.cog-eng
Subject: Re: One Step...
Message-ID: <151@radar.UUCP>
Date: 16 Jan 89 13:55:41 GMT
References: <263@gloom.UUCP> <4498@xenna.Encore.COM> <69@poppy.warwick.ac.uk>
Reply-To: donn@radar.UUCP ()
Organization: CDS Consulting/Macinterested, Nashville, TN
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message