Article View: comp.windows.misc
Article #1400Re: Open Look versus Motif, and it's effect on NeWS vs. X.
From: Matt Landau
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1990 05:34
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1990 05:34
14 lines
1283 bytes
1283 bytes
peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes: >> Unless: [dynamic linking] + a single API for both Motif and Open Look + >> [binary compatible interface] >That's a good point. If you can get the APIs together for Motif and Open >Look it should be possible to let the user select them. So "unreasonable" >isn't a fair description. >Is anyone working on this, though? Yes, someone is working on this. There is a project at AT&T called N3 (last time I checked up on it) that's trying to define a single API that will produce either OpenLook or Motif look-and-feel, depending on which library you link with at runtime. Unfortunately, it's an Xt-based programming model (unfortunate if, like me, you don't like the Xt model in the first place), but at least it's an attempt to do the right thing.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<13509@garnet.BBN.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!mephisto!bbn!diamond.bbn.com!mlandauReferences:
<IXP1PQ5xds13@ficc.uu.net> <2935@auspex.auspex.com> <:8S1SU7xds13@ficc.uu.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!mephisto!bbn!diamond.bbn.com!mlandau From: mlandau@bbn.com (Matt Landau) Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc Subject: Re: Open Look versus Motif, and it's effect on NeWS vs. X. Message-ID: <13509@garnet.BBN.COM> Date: 16 Feb 90 05:34:13 GMT References: <IXP1PQ5xds13@ficc.uu.net> <2935@auspex.auspex.com> <:8S1SU7xds13@ficc.uu.net> Organization: BBN Systems and Technologies Corporation, Cambridge, MA Lines: 14