Article View: comp.windows.misc
Article #1416Re: Open Look versus Motif, and it's effect on NeWS vs. X.
From: Jim Gettys
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1990 15:12
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1990 15:12
10 lines
928 bytes
928 bytes
Huh? I don't see your line of reasoning here.... One might just as well provide two different shared libraries, with the same programming interface. Putting things in the server does not follow as the only way to solve the problem of different "look and feels". The real problem here is that OpenLook and Motif provide different programming interfaces, not where they are implemented....
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4547@crltrx.crl.dec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!crltrx!max!jgReferences:
<IXP1PQ5xds13@ficc.uu.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!crltrx!max!jg From: jg@max.crl.dec.com (Jim Gettys) Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc Subject: Re: Open Look versus Motif, and it's effect on NeWS vs. X. Message-ID: <4547@crltrx.crl.dec.com> Date: 13 Feb 90 15:12:43 GMT References: <IXP1PQ5xds13@ficc.uu.net> Sender: news@crltrx.crl.dec.com Reply-To: jg@max.crl.dec.com (Jim Gettys) Organization: DEC Cambridge Research Lab Lines: 10