Re: Stacker 2.0 and Windows 3.1

Article View: comp.windows.misc

Article #204

#204

From: RALPH KOTOSKI
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 21:48

27 lines
1409 bytes

>does anyone know if Stacker 2.0 is compatible with Smartdrv 4.0 of Windows 3.1?

I'm using all three without a single problem...

>that is, if i install Stacker, can i still cache the stacked drive?

The Stacker Manual recommends caching the harddrive that contains
STACVOL.  This way, the stacked drive is cached and you can bring
more into cache since it is compressed.

>when i read the readme.wri in windows directory, it says
superstor is not compatible with smartdrv.

>that means you can't cache the drive that is superstored

>is that true for stacker 2.0 also?

Don't know what superstor is.  But shouldn't need to cache STACVOL,
just the drive it resides on.  Hope this helps....


Ralph Kotoski                          Hewlett-Packard PSO
Performance Specialist                 Neely Sales Region
ralphk@hpuecoz.nsr.hp.com              24 Inverness Place East
Ralph_Kotoski@hpatc3.desk.hp.com       Englewood, Colorado    80112
(303)-T649-5761                   :^)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <13050002@hpuecoz.NSR.HP.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!hpscdc!hplextra!hpcc05!hpunila!hpfcse!hpuecoz!ralphk

References: <1992Aug10.173005.17166@wuecl.wustl.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: ralphk@hpuecoz.NSR.HP.COM (RALPH KOTOSKI)
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 21:48:19 GMT
Subject: Re: Stacker 2.0 and Windows 3.1
Message-ID: <13050002@hpuecoz.NSR.HP.COM>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Englewood, CO
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!hpscdc!hplextra!hpcc05!hpunila!hpfcse!hpuecoz!ralphk
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
References: <1992Aug10.173005.17166@wuecl.wustl.edu>
Lines: 27

Reply to Parent Message