Article View: comp.windows.misc
Article #207Re: Window and * megs of ram, what next?s
From: Vincent F. Scarafino
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 14:43
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 14:43
15 lines
1037 bytes
1037 bytes
nauman@Pt.hq.af.mil (Stratton D Nauman) writes: ...... > 3. The rest of the memory (640 k for DOS, 7200k extended) The extended > memory, I split up between Windows, and Smartdrv. Smart drive Cache > size is something thats sort of a user preference thing, however, I > use a 2 megabyte size. Im thinking about changing it to make it a little > bit bigger. For most workload characteristics, increasing the smardrv cache beyond 2 meg does not appreciably increase the cache hit ratio. You are probably better off leaving the extra memory with Windows. Vince
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BtnCw5.LI1@fmsrl7.srl.ford.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!fmsrl7!eccdb1.pms.ford.com!vscarafiReferences:
<nauman.714658353@hq>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!fmsrl7!eccdb1.pms.ford.com!vscarafi From: vscarafi@eccdb1.pms.ford.com (Vincent F. Scarafino) Subject: Re: Window and * megs of ram, what next?s Message-ID: <BtnCw5.LI1@fmsrl7.srl.ford.com> Originator: news@pms001 Sender: usenet@fmsrl7.srl.ford.com (0000-Admin(0000)) Organization: Ford Motor Co. References: <nauman.714658353@hq> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 14:43:12 GMT Lines: 15