Re: Maybe R5 wishes, or a "better" way to construct X, or something

Article View: comp.windows.misc

Article #294

#294

From: Rainer Klute
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 1990 06:42

24 lines
1551 bytes

In article <7939@gollum.twg.com>, david@twg.com (David S. Herron) writes:
|> I would like to see two things:
|> 
|> -- Use of "lightweight processes" for some level of the widgetry.  The
|>    correct level is unclear to me at the moment.


	N o ,   d o n ' t   d o   i t !

The lightweight process library is not only UNIX-specific, it is even
SunOS-specific. Please consider those who do not program on a UNIX machine!
Take me as an example: I am developing X software for BS2000 where you
don't even have something like fork().

In general: Please write your applications as portable as possible! Put
OS-specific things in separate modules. Design and document the interface
clearly so that the system specific module can easyly be reprogrammed on
another OS!

--
  Dipl.-Inform. Rainer Klute      klute@unido.informatik.uni-dortmund.de
  Univ. Dortmund, IRB             klute@unido.uucp, klute@unido.bitnet
  Postfach 500500         |)|/    Tel.: +49 231 755-4663
D-4600 Dortmund 50        |\|\    Fax : +49 231 755-2386

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Sep18.084254@heike.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!unido!laura!heike!klute

References: <7939@gollum.twg.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!unido!laura!heike!klute
From: klute@heike.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (Rainer Klute)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
Subject: Re: Maybe R5 wishes, or a "better" way to construct X, or something
Message-ID: <1990Sep18.084254@heike.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
Date: 18 Sep 90 06:42:54 GMT
References: <7939@gollum.twg.com>
Sender: news@laura.UUCP
Reply-To: klute@heike.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (Rainer Klute)
Organization: University of Dortmund, FRG
Lines: 24

Reply to Parent Message