Article View: comp.windows.misc
Article #356Re: 3 questions about Windows 3.0
From: Bob Sutterfield
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 1990 14:21
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 1990 14:21
2 lines
611 bytes
611 bytes
Wouldn't MS Windows discussions be more appropriate in
comp.windows.ms{.programmer}?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BOB.90Dec27092106@volitans.MorningStar.Com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!usc!samsung!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mstar!mstar.morningstar.com!bobShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!usc!samsung!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mstar!mstar.morningstar.com!bob From: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc Subject: Re: 3 questions about Windows 3.0 Message-ID: <BOB.90Dec27092106@volitans.MorningStar.Com> Date: 27 Dec 90 14:21:14 GMT Sender: usenet@MorningStar.COM (USENET Administrator) Organization: Morning Star Technologies Lines: 2