🚀 go-pugleaf

From article <260@picker.picker.com>, by kobetitsch@picker.picker.com (harry kobetitsch):
> A heated battle rages on in my work group. I would like to
> know the pros and cons when comparing X (including Motif)
> to Windows 3.0? I would like some facts to back up an
> argument on either side.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 

Honestly, there are very few similarities except in the Window manager
portion.  I guess I'll assume you speak from a 'users' standpoint.  In
this case (this'll heat things up) I would say X is superior.  Lets examine
why.  X is not limited to a single machine.  If you are logged into a
machine in Germany from USA, and you have an X server running, you can
run X applications (maybe slowly depending on the comm links) and see
the GUI 'as it were..  That doesn't happen in Windows.  Second, UNIX, 
bar none, is the ultimate multitasker (Mach included for those who want
to throw OS/2 in for threaded code) and that means you can count on
Comm programs NOT losing characters.  Third, Windows crashes your
machine happily.  UNIX does not (or VAX/VMS and other OS/s over which
X runs).  Which brings me the the real point.  Windows sucks, BUT
DAMN it looks neat.  So does the (I'm male so bare (pun) with me) Blonde
at the beach.  Talk to her, 'cause she can't talk back.

Windows and X are similar in one respect and one only.  Both are dependent
on an operating system above them.  Windows=DOS, X=<many>.  Does this
make a difference??? Well, think market share here.  MANY DOS machines,
not nearly so many X machines.  I won't go into this - marketing is NOT
an engineers domain.  BUT, the two shells are similar in conceptual
operation in a 'computer' sense.

So, what am I saying anyway???  Here it is in a nutshell:
	If its money you want, go Windows, if its REAL operation,
Go X.  WHY????  Two vastly different reasons.  Developers love
UNIX.  WHY????  Because its a developers paradise.  Core dumps (as
opposed to machine hangs), TRUE multitasking (not horsecrap non-preemptive -
what a joke) and definitely raw power.  Go ahead try this in DOS (not
Phar Lap type DOS):
	s = malloc(1,000,000 * sizeof(char));
Uh, Uh.

Users???, Windows.  There's just too much fun pushing a button and
seeing it move (Motif is crummy on this).  Ok, enough rambling...
Its Friday (miller time, ya know)...  I hope everybody thinks on
these things.  Don't just let your hackles raise.  Think on it.
No ansers here, If I had 'em I'd be a GaJillionAre.  So why did
I write this anyway.  Think on it!

|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Tom Hite					|  The views expressed by me |
|Manager, Product development			|  are mine, not necessarily |
|CADSI (Computer Aided Design Software Inc.	|  the views of CADSI.       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|