Re: My Opinion: NeWS vs X

Article View: comp.windows.misc

Article #804

#804

From: Silver
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1988 05:45

10 lines
853 bytes

I wrote, somewhat uninformed as to the internals of X:
> Is there any merit to the following proposal: For X, write a
> buffering routine which buffers calls to X routines into chunks, and
> `write out' the buffer via a call to a buffer-outputting routine or
> by meeting a condition.

Apparently, this *is* the way things are done (or something real
similar).  So, I guess there was merit to the proposal.  :-)

[Ag]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <18060@topaz.rutgers.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!gaynor

References: <1677@desint.UUCP> <3835@megaron.arizona.edu> <2936@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <18058@topaz.rutgers.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!gaynor
From: gaynor@topaz.rutgers.edu (Silver)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
Subject: Re: My Opinion: NeWS vs X
Message-ID: <18060@topaz.rutgers.edu>
Date: 14 Feb 88 05:45:22 GMT
References: <1677@desint.UUCP> <3835@megaron.arizona.edu> <2936@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <18058@topaz.rutgers.edu>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message