Re: Why I'm suspicious of comp.windows.misc experts

Article View: comp.windows.misc

Article #813

#813

From: Stephen C. North
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1988 15:42

9 lines
1014 bytes

would anyone that has written at least a few nontrivial
interactive graphics programs in both X and NeWS care to
comment?  i realize it's a lot easier to just post articles
that say "i haven't tried <whatever> but i'm sure if i did i
wouldn't like it and besides although i haven't looked at a
single line of code i know the implementation is very
machine dependent or at least utterly bogus."  still the
believability of such testimonials is somewhat questionable.
Parturiunt montes, nascetur ridiculus mus!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <10070@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!hector!north

References: <1677@desint.UUCP> <3835@megaron.arizona.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!hector!north
From: north@hector.UUCP (Stephen C. North)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
Subject: Re: Why I'm suspicious of comp.windows.misc experts
Message-ID: <10070@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Date: 13 Feb 88 15:42:01 GMT
References: <1677@desint.UUCP> <3835@megaron.arizona.edu>
Sender: netnews@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com
Reply-To: north@hector (Stephen C. North)
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message