Article View: comp.windows.misc
Article #844Well, I'm impressed.
From: Peter da Silva
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1988 00:23
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1988 00:23
12 lines
936 bytes
936 bytes
Well, after following the threads of discussion here for a while longer, NeWS is looking more and more desirable. How UNIX-dependent is NeWS, and how tightly can you compile display PostScript. Also, are NeWS or DP very proprietary? I think the ever-more-baroque growth of System V is showing just what the problem is with a proprietary standard that doesn't get the advantage of competing sub- and super-sets. NeWS looks like a natural for systems with efficient lightweight processes like the Amiga. -- -- Peter da Silva `-_-' ...!hoptoad!academ!uhnix1!sugar!peter -- Disclaimer: These U aren't mere opinions... these are *values*.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1500@sugar.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!nuchat!sugar!peterShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!nuchat!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.UUCP (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc Subject: Well, I'm impressed. Message-ID: <1500@sugar.UUCP> Date: 28 Feb 88 00:23:26 GMT Organization: Sugar Land UNIX - Houston, TX Lines: 12 Keywords: NeWS, X