Article View: comp.windows.misc
Article #988Re: Cut-and-paste (was Re: sharedx and remote conferencing)
From: Ron Voss
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 1988 18:45
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 1988 18:45
15 lines
1250 bytes
1250 bytes
R.J.Faichney (rjf@ford.UUCP) writes:
>
>So I say 'Cut cut buffers out of X -- and the rest'. Who would argue?
>
Ok, I'll bite. Doesn't making the applications worry about all this
complicate them, make them all larger? As for the transformations, I don't
care, I think. It's not a performance issue, since the CPU is faster
than the hand. I am used to the way the Mac works; it seems
intuitive. I don't hear you stating an advantage of getting the
cut buffer out of X, I just hear your preference.
--
Ron Voss, Senior Systems Engineer, Motorola Microcomputer Division
UUCP: {hplabs,mot,oakhill}!motsj1!rnv CIS: 73647,752
Tel: 408-991-7390 Snail: 1150 Kifer Road, Sunnyvale, CA 94086
Opinions: Mine, not necessarily employer's.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<567@motsj1.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!rutgers!ucsd!ucbvax!decwrl!hplabs!motsj1!rnvReferences:
<5411@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> <5442@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!rutgers!ucsd!ucbvax!decwrl!hplabs!motsj1!rnv From: rnv@motsj1.UUCP (Ron Voss) Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc Subject: Re: Cut-and-paste (was Re: sharedx and remote conferencing) Message-ID: <567@motsj1.UUCP> Date: 10 Aug 88 18:45:13 GMT References: <5411@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> <5442@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> Reply-To: rnv@motsj1.UUCP (Ron Voss) Organization: Motorola Microcomputer Division, San Jose Ca. Lines: 15