Article View: comp.windows.misc
Article #99Re: Pushpin patented?
From: Tom LaStrange
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 15:05
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 15:05
27 lines
1378 bytes
1378 bytes
In article <ABRAHAM.92Apr15220343@galilei.iesd.auc.dk>, abraham@iesd.auc.dk (Per Abrahamsen) writes: |> |> >>>>> On 14 Apr 92 03:40:32 GMT, nazgul@alphalpha.com (Kee Hinckley) said: |> |> Kee> However OL is certainly not unique in having multiple toolkits: |> |> Kee> Motif Open Look |> [...] |> Kee> OLIT X |> (should get Motif GUI support soon) |> |> [...] |> Kee> Solbourne's OI X X |> |> No, but try asking e.g. Solbourne what they feel about playing catch up |> to OSF/Motif with regard to the Motif GUI, compared to being ahead of |> the Sun toolkits in some areas with regard to OPEN LOOK compliance. Since you asked... It's a royal pain in the butt. |> The Motif GUI seems merely to be a description of how the current version of |> OSF/Motif looks and feels. Right. -- Tom LaStrange toml@Solbourne.COM
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr16.150534.1073@solbourne.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stan!morgul!tomlReferences:
<0npjn4o@openlook.Unify.Com> <1992Apr4.055318.20125@alphalpha.com> <ABRAHAM.92Apr15220343@galilei.iesd.auc.dk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stan!morgul!toml From: toml@morgul.Solbourne.COM (Tom LaStrange) Subject: Re: Pushpin patented? Message-ID: <1992Apr16.150534.1073@solbourne.com> Sender: news@solbourne.com Nntp-Posting-Host: morgul.solbourne.com Reply-To: toml@solbourne.com Organization: Solbourne Computer, Inc. References: <0npjn4o@openlook.Unify.Com> <1992Apr4.055318.20125@alphalpha.com> <ABRAHAM.92Apr15220343@galilei.iesd.auc.dk> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 15:05:34 GMT Lines: 27