Thread View: comp.windows.misc
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by Randy Ricklefs
Thu, 22 Dec 1988 13:36
Re: replacing the desktop metaphor
Author: Randy Ricklefs
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1988 13:36
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1988 13:36
22 lines
1388 bytes
1388 bytes
> [references to other article deleted]
> Flat-screen monitor 2 inches thick, 3 feet square. Hang it on the wall. The
> CPU and magnetic/optical storage device (!) are stuck under a desk or something.
What about replacing the entire top of a desk with some type of flat display?
Then add a touch-screen mechanism to drag papers, forms, etc. across the desk
top to work on them. (Then your electronic desktop could become as cluttered
as the physical one. :-) )
> A monitor as described is a ways down the road, for sure, but I don't know
> why a wireless keyboard would be far-fetched.
I believe IBM used an IR-based detached keyboard on their much-maligned
PC jr. I haven't seen anyone take up that gauntlet since then.
>
> Ron
>
Randy
--
Randy Ricklefs
uucp: {ut-sally, ut-ngp, noao, charm}!utastro!rlr
arpa: rlr@astro.AS.UTEXAS.EDU phone: (512) 471-1342
Re: replacing the desktop metaphor
Author: David Casseres
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1988 19:35
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1988 19:35
17 lines
1384 bytes
1384 bytes
In article <3494@utastro.UUCP> rlr@utastro.UUCP (Randy Ricklefs) writes: >What about replacing the entire top of a desk with some type of flat display? >Then add a touch-screen mechanism to drag papers, forms, etc. across the desk >top to work on them. (Then your electronic desktop could become as cluttered >as the physical one. :-) ) I think it was Johan Strandberg who said years ago that the "right" size for the display is not "full-page" (uh, should it be legal size or metric?), nor "two-page," but the size of an opened-up newspaper, since that is the size that evolved as suitable for displaying multiple "windows" of inform- ation. Once you have that, he argued, you should build it into the top of your desk -- not because it's supposed to represent a desktop, but basically for ergonomic reasons and because once you have reached this Nirvana, you won't need the desktop space for anything else! David Casseres
Re: replacing the desktop metaphor
Author: Per Danielsson
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 1988 16:32
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 1988 16:32
34 lines
2174 bytes
2174 bytes
In article <356@internal.Apple.COM>, casseres@Apple (David Casseres) writes: >In article <3494@utastro.UUCP> rlr@utastro.UUCP (Randy Ricklefs) writes: > >>What about replacing the entire top of a desk with some type of flat display? >>[...] > >I think it was Johan Strandberg who said years ago that the "right" size >for the display is not "full-page" (uh, should it be legal size or metric?), >nor "two-page," but the size of an opened-up newspaper, since that is the >size that evolved as suitable for displaying multiple "windows" of inform- >ation. I agree about the size of the display, but only if it is to be used in conjunction with other office equipment on an ordinary desk. Make it larger and you have to move your head around to much. > Once you have that, he argued, you should build it into the top >of your desk -- not because it's supposed to represent a desktop, but >basically for ergonomic reasons and because once you have reached this >Nirvana, you won't need the desktop space for anything else! If you won't be using anything else but your computer you need a much larger interface area than a newspaper size screen. A room with all of the wall used as screens is then necessary, I think. Take a look at the Media Room at MIT's Architecture Machine Group (if it still exists it wold now be at the MIT Media Lab). >David Casseres PD Per Danielsson UUCP: pd@sics.se (or ...!enea!sics!pd) Swedish Institute of Computer Science PO Box 1263, S-164 28 KISTA, SWEDEN "No wife, no horse, no moustache."
Re: replacing the desktop metaphor
Author: Erik Hyypia
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 1988 17:08
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 1988 17:08
82 lines
4550 bytes
4550 bytes
Heads-Up_Displays (HUD) are already in existance, used by the military
to merge many different data into one coherent image (infra-red camera
image, light-image, data about the aircraft, etc). Although they are
in their infancy, and are still bulky, technical evolution will work
its metamorphasis here.
Voice recognition, again in its infancy, will flesh out to become a
useful tool as well.
Combine these two ideas with local-area radio-link networking, and you
have the office of the future: A wireless, heads-up-display with
microphone and speakers, which integrates "computing" functionality
(as we use the term now) with voice/video communications between the
user, the computer(s) and other people, library functionality (graphical
as well as data), in stereo, 3-D, color. It will be light enough not
to muss the hair, will become the upper-crust style, and free the
office worker from his/her/its desk.
Sally was just finishing her math homework, keeping an eye
on kid brother Joey in a corner window, when the call came through.
The sounds of crashing surf and clinking glasses tickled
her right ear, demanding romantic attention. The large
blue moon and sexy silhouette identified the caller as
Bret, feeling his hormones again. She whispered off the
old French movie she dug up from the Paris film banks from
the upper left window (how *had* they persuaded that
woman to do those things?), killed the math, and zoomed
in on this nostalgic man's imagery. Creative, but
a little too blunt for her tastes. She dimmed her video
(after all she was in the tub) and answered with her best
business-woman's tone.
"No, I can't trade images right now, I'm interviewing with
Johannesburg Shuttle in ten minutes," she said tartly. "Here,
grab this and call me tonight." She tossed him the French
window, clicked off, towled off, and finished dressing before
the interview popped up. She was glad that these new head-sets
were almost transparent from the outside; the interviewers
would see her sharp eyes as well as her resume. She adjusted
the curls under the head-band, wandered into the living room,
and sat down in front of the book-case. Yes, idiosyncratic as
it was, she still liked the smell of the old books. Of course,
she did all her reading, editing and creative work with the
eye-panels down, but nostalgia has its place...
During the interview, they tossed her some hard problems, including
a debris collision scenario which was vaguely familiar to
something from the old NASA banks. She subvocalized up
the old images, saw the quirk, and integrated the proof
into her quick calculations. Looking back into the Johannesburg
window, she picked up the composite work and placed it on the
interviewer's desk. Nice touch, she thought, demonstrating
a polite artistry in data manipulation. He smiled, sending her
a jobsite tour while he analyzed her responses. The day was
going well, and that ankle-biter in the corner window stayed
quiet too! With luck she would have a summer job, a date that
night, and some free time to scrounge the Paris archives some
more. Maybe even work on that trick of watching different movies
in a left-eye window and a right-eye window simultaneously. Of
course you lost depth perception, but hey, it had potential anyway...
She put down the hand exerciser (helped break the tension during
the interview) and wandered into the kitchen as the Johannesburg
tour rolled on, stopping the scene occasionally, and directing
the tour to zoom in on specific faces, or peer around interesting
corners in the launch site. Better hold off on the PB&J sandwich
until after the interview she though, since it made sub-vocalizing
difficult.
<erik@cadnetix.COM> Erik Hyypia "One need not lose the child-like
sparkle of life, just because he
grows up!"
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads