Thread View: comp.windows.misc
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Stan Switzer
Fri, 19 May 1989 14:48
More's the PTY...
Author: Stan Switzer
Date: Fri, 19 May 1989 14:48
Date: Fri, 19 May 1989 14:48
6 lines
642 bytes
642 bytes
Does anyone else find it remarkable that in this day and age people still view files by running "more" in a window emulating a TTY? Responses to /dev/rhetorical. Stan Switzer sjs@ctt.bellcore.com
Re: More's the PTY...
Author: Carlo Lisa
Date: Sat, 20 May 1989 20:49
Date: Sat, 20 May 1989 20:49
8 lines
676 bytes
676 bytes
>>Does anyone else find it remarkable that in this day and age people >>still view files by running "more" in a window emulating a TTY? Absolutely TRUE! This is the reason for I'm writing Xless, the X Window version for less (it's almost ready......). Carlo Lisa carlo@athena.mit.edu
Re: More's the PTY...
Author: Peter da Silva
Date: Sun, 21 May 1989 19:53
Date: Sun, 21 May 1989 19:53
16 lines
1068 bytes
1068 bytes
In article <16246@bellcore.bellcore.com>, sjs@spectral.ctt.bellcore.com (Stan Switzer) writes: > Does anyone else find it remarkable that in this day and age people > still view files by running "more" in a window emulating a TTY? I run 'less', myself. Come up with a standard program-window interface and a file browser with the capability of less, and I'll switch. Hell... come up with a program-window interface that's worth a damn. I sure haven't seen one yet. -- Peter da Silva, Xenix Support, Ferranti International Controls Corporation. Business: uunet.uu.net!ficc!peter, peter@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180. Personal: ...!texbell!sugar!peter, peter@sugar.hackercorp.com.
Re: More's the PTY...
Author: Kee Hinckley
Date: Tue, 23 May 1989 17:01
Date: Tue, 23 May 1989 17:01
15 lines
1487 bytes
1487 bytes
In article <16246@bellcore.bellcore.com>, sjs@spectral.ctt.bellcore.com (Stan Switzer) writes:
> Does anyone else find it remarkable that in this day and age people
> still view files by running "more" in a window emulating a TTY?
For 5 years I didn't use more or terminal eumulators. Just press a key,
type the file name, and poof - a full editor on it, no matter which machine
it was on, in which network, in which building. Or if I prefered,
point the mouse at the filename, click a button... there was the file.
Now of course I use X, and I'm back to psuedo terminals again. Oh well.
--
### User Environment, Apollo Computer Inc. ### Public Access ProLine BBS ###
### {mit-eddie,yale}!apollo!nazgul ### nazgul@pro-angmar.cts.com ###
### nazgul@apollo.com ### (617) 641-3722 300/1200/2400 ###
I'm not sure which upsets me more; that people are so unwilling to accept responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate everyone else's.
Re: More's the PTY...
Author: Bill Janssen
Date: Fri, 26 May 1989 01:47
Date: Fri, 26 May 1989 01:47
14 lines
1219 bytes
1219 bytes
In article <4365854d.1b147@apollo.COM>, nazgul@apollo (Kee Hinckley) writes: >For 5 years I didn't use more or terminal eumulators. Just press a key, >type the file name, and poof - a full editor on it, no matter which machine >it was on, in which network, in which building. Or if I prefered, >point the mouse at the filename, click a button... there was the file. Umm... I have the same situation, but I don't suppose you would think that it counts, seeing as it's GNU Emacs, or for multi-media things, Andrew ez. >Now of course I use X, and I'm back to psuedo terminals again. Not necessarily. Bill
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads