Re: Latest Windows version

Article View: comp.windows.ms.programmer

Article #1221

Back to comp.windows.ms.programmer Previous Next

#1221

From: Ron Dippold
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 1991 20:34

12 lines
1214 bytes

In article <26760@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> jdb@reef.cis.ufl.edu (Brian K. W. Hook) writes:
>
>I am about to undergo some program development using Windows 3.0 on a 386
>machine.  I will be using C6.00....what I am wondering is if there is a
>newer version of Windows out there since I have Windows 3.00a and Microsoft
>is infamouse for its maintenance releases that don't really count as 

There will be a new version of Windows 3 coming out soon, but it's not here
yet.  What you need to be worried about is the C6.00 which is incredibly
buggy.  If your C6.00 is not C6.00a, make sure you get the upgrade.  There
are about 70 listed bugs with C6.00a (most related to optimization), and
C6.00 is much worse.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1991Feb8.203445.14291@qualcomm.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!ogicse!ucsd!qualcom.qualcomm.com!rdippold

References: <175@maillot_.gtephx.UUCP> <27331@spudge.UUCP> <26760@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!ogicse!ucsd!qualcom.qualcomm.com!rdippold
From: rdippold@qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer,comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Latest Windows version
Summary: C6.00
Message-ID: <1991Feb8.203445.14291@qualcomm.com>
Date: 8 Feb 91 20:34:45 GMT
References: <175@maillot_.gtephx.UUCP> <27331@spudge.UUCP> <26760@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>
Organization: Qualcomm Inc., San Diego, CA
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message