Article View: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Article #1312Re: Having an EXE and DLL of the same name
From: Ed Schwalenberg
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 1991 15:18
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 1991 15:18
15 lines
1264 bytes
1264 bytes
In article <15097@uudell.dell.com> jporter@twaddle.dell.com (Jeff Porter) writes: In article <7134@hsv3.UUCP>, jls@hsv3.UUCP (James Seidman) writes: |> |> I'm probably missing something really obvious here. I have a program |> which requires a DLL to go along with it. I'd like to have them named |> the same (e.g. XYZPROG.EXE and XYZPROG.DLL). Windows only allows either a DLL or EXE with a given name. It's a documented feature in the SDK manuals. Oh, twaddle. (Sorry, I couldn't resist.) Look at PBRUSH.EXE/PBRUSH.DLL in your Windows directory with EXEHDR. The secret is that the module name of PBRUSH.EXE is actually PBRUSHX. Develop XYZPROG.DLL and XYZPROGX.EXE, then rename the latter to XYZPROG.EXE before execution and you're all set.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Feb13.151814.25905@odi.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!telly!lethe!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!odi!edReferences:
<7134@hsv3.UUCP> <15097@uudell.dell.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!telly!lethe!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!odi!ed From: ed@odi.com (Ed Schwalenberg) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer Subject: Re: Having an EXE and DLL of the same name Message-ID: <1991Feb13.151814.25905@odi.com> Date: 13 Feb 91 15:18:14 GMT References: <7134@hsv3.UUCP> <15097@uudell.dell.com> Organization: Object Design, Inc. Lines: 15 In-Reply-To: jporter@twaddle.dell.com's message of 12 Feb 91 23:44:35 GMT