Article View: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Article #1574Re: Borland C++ bug and impressions
From: Mark Lord
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1991 14:16
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1991 14:16
18 lines
1447 bytes
1447 bytes
In article <502b302b.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM> ced@apollo.HP.COM (Carl Davidson) writes: <From article <1991Mar4.144002.4355@informix.com>, by sdavid@infmx.informix.com (David Sherrick): <> <> The second thing I noticed (much to my surprise), when I compiled the same <> source code with MSC 6.00 and Borland C++. The MSC executable was smaller <> than the Borland executable (24k vs 28k) and I had optimization turn OFF <> in MSC and ON in Borland C++. <> <Could the difference in size be due to the optimizer unrolling loops, etc.? Differences like these are almost always due to the varying implementations and packaging of the library routines. As such, the larger your program gets, the less significance this will have. -- ___Mark S. Lord__________________________________________ | ..uunet!bnrgate!mlord%bmerh724 | Climb Free Or Die (NH) | | MLORD@BNR.CA Ottawa, Ontario | Personal views only. | |________________________________|________________________|
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5972@bwdls58.bnr.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!bwdls58!mlordReferences:
<1991Mar4.144002.4355@informix.com> <502b302b.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!bwdls58!mlord From: mlord@bwdls58.bnr.ca (Mark Lord) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer Subject: Re: Borland C++ bug and impressions Message-ID: <5972@bwdls58.bnr.ca> Date: 8 Mar 91 14:16:40 GMT References: <1991Mar4.144002.4355@informix.com> <502b302b.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM> Sender: mlord@bwdls58.bnr.ca Reply-To: mlord@bwdls58.bnr.ca (Mark Lord) Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Ottawa, Canada Lines: 18