Article View: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Article #1754Re: Borland C++ vs Microsoft C 5.10
From: Ka Chin Wong
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1991 23:43
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1991 23:43
20 lines
1062 bytes
1062 bytes
>boyd_m@intertel.UUCP (Mark Boyd) writes: >> Microsoft C 5.1 .EXE: 720672 bytes >> Borland C++ .EXE: 842848 bytes > >Ok guys, anyone care to comment? I am glad that you mentioned Microsoft C (not Microsoft C++) vs. Borland C++ (not Turbo C). You know, in C, all variables are static bound (early bounding), but C++ allows dynamic bounding (late bounding) by means of virtual functions. Would the additional bytes be the overhead to handle late bounding at runtime? Let's wait for the Microsoft C++ and do the comparison. Rick
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<27e7f3b2.12fb@petunia.CalPoly.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!petunia!newsReferences:
<350@intertel.UUCP> <7320@idunno.Princeton.EDU> <1991Mar19.231934.2007@borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!petunia!news From: kwong@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (Ka Chin Wong) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer Subject: Re: Borland C++ vs Microsoft C 5.10 Keywords: windows borland microsoft Message-ID: <27e7f3b2.12fb@petunia.CalPoly.EDU> Date: 20 Mar 91 23:43:46 GMT References: <350@intertel.UUCP> <7320@idunno.Princeton.EDU> <1991Mar19.231934.2007@borland.com> Organization: Cal Poly State Univ,CSC Dept,San Luis Obispo,CA 93407 Lines: 20