Re: Borland C++ vs Microsoft C 5.10

Article View: comp.windows.ms.programmer

Article #1802

Back to comp.windows.ms.programmer Previous Next

#1802

From: Tony J Yeates
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1991 20:51

3 lines
720 bytes

Doesn't compiler optimization usually optimise for speed rather than size?
Obviously speed improvements will sometimes be at the cost of increased size.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6056@iron6.UUCP>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!ftpbox!motsrd!motcid!yeates

References: <350@intertel.UUCP> <7320@idunno.Princeton.EDU> <1991Mar19.231934.2007@borland.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!ftpbox!motsrd!motcid!yeates
From: yeates@motcid.UUCP (Tony J Yeates)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: Re: Borland C++ vs Microsoft C 5.10
Keywords: windows borland microsoft
Message-ID: <6056@iron6.UUCP>
Date: 22 Mar 91 20:51:26 GMT
References: <350@intertel.UUCP> <7320@idunno.Princeton.EDU> <1991Mar19.231934.2007@borland.com>
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Div., Arlington Heights, IL
Lines: 3

Reply to Parent Message