🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1991Mar26.034919.1670@borland.com> sidney@borland.com (Sidney Markowitz) writes:
|>jdb@reef.cis.ufl.edu (Brian K. W. Hook) writes:
|>>Would someone please explain to me what exactly the difference between
|>>these two options are?  I know about exported functions, etc. but why
|>>wouldn't ALL functions exported work instead of just smart callbacks?
|>
|>The option is not really all functions exported, it's all functions
|>exportable. A function will not be actually exported unless you either
|>use the _export keyword in its declaration, or enter the function name
|>in the EXPORTS section of the module definition file. So if smart
|>callbacks worked and all functions exportable did not, the difference
|>is likely to be that you missed exporting one or more functions in the
|>latter case. By the way, that seems to be the single most common
|>reason I have seen for BC++ Windows programs failing.
|>
|> -- sidney markowitz <sidney@borland.com>

Obviously I am heavily confused here when and where a function needs to be
exported.  As far as I know, a function must be exported when Windows
itself will be calling a function from within Windows....example,
MainWndProc is called directly via function pointer by Windows.

NOOOOWWWWW....I would assume that since this is the case, MainWndProc MUST
be exported.  And since most of my simple programs have worked just fine up
until I added LoadBitmap(), why would it quit working by adding just
another function call in MainWndProc?  More specifically, how would
exporting MainWndProc (or whatever the hell I'm exporting with -WS!) affect
whether LoadBitmap() works or not?

Thanks,

Brian