BC++ vs C6/SDK

Article View: comp.windows.ms.programmer

Article #1958

Back to comp.windows.ms.programmer Previous Next

#1958

From: Glenn Wallace
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1991 14:14

21 lines
1174 bytes

Borland Pacific (read Australia) tell me my BC++ will be delayed...
shipping problems they say. Maybe the IDE will run in Enchanted mode by then
:-)

We have about 10-15 people working on development of one package using
C6 and SDK. I haven't seen BC++ in the flesh yet, but I doubt it is going
to be robust enough to _seriously_ use.

All the comments I see on here seem to indicate a reasonable degree of
"flakiness" and "released-too-early-ness" with BC++.

Is there anyone using BC++ for "finished product" type development, or
only tinkering?

For DOS (ugh) work, I still prefer TC++ for tinkering/development
and then C6.0a for release.

Glenn          "I shall remember to EXPORT EXPORT EXPORT my DlgProcs"
=====
sig ommitted to save wear and tear on modems.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1991Apr4.091431.26337@qut.edu.au>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!njin!uupsi!rpi!batcomputer!munnari.oz.au!brolga!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!qut.edu.au!drift

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!njin!uupsi!rpi!batcomputer!munnari.oz.au!brolga!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!qut.edu.au!drift
From: drift@qut.edu.au (Glenn Wallace)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: BC++ vs C6/SDK
Message-ID: <1991Apr4.091431.26337@qut.edu.au>
Date: 4 Apr 91 14:14:30 GMT
Organization: Queensland University of Technology
Lines: 21