Article View: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Article #2369Re: MS Windows Classes
From: John Munsch
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1991 16:40
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1991 16:40
20 lines
1472 bytes
1472 bytes
In article <1991Apr25.134339.28411@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> ebergman@isis.UUCP (Eric Bergman-Terrell) writes: >In particular, the Windows routines are called the same way (in fact >both use the same windows.h file (which has all the function prototypes). > >The chief advantage of BC++ 2.0 is speed. I've used MS C 5.1 and it's >simply too slow. Borland's compiler is much faster. Another perspective on the same thing... The chief advantage of BC++ 2.0 over MSC X.X is that it is a C++ compiler capable of generating Windows programs. The chief advantage of BC++ over Zortech is its speed and overall package quality (more bang for the buck due to WRT and TDW, etc.). I believe that if you aren't at least starting to use C++ to reduce the complexity of your Windows application programming then you are missing out on most of the power of this system. John Munsch "Gentlemen, STOP FIGHTING. This is the War Room." - Dr. Strangelove
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<28947@spudge.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!letni!rwsys!spudge!johnmReferences:
<1991Apr23.203123.23403@odetics.com> <1991Apr25.134339.28411@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!letni!rwsys!spudge!johnm From: johnm@spudge.UUCP (John Munsch) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer Subject: Re: MS Windows Classes Message-ID: <28947@spudge.UUCP> Date: 29 Apr 91 16:40:44 GMT References: <1991Apr23.203123.23403@odetics.com> <1991Apr25.134339.28411@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> Reply-To: johnm@spudge.UUCP (John Munsch) Organization: Friends of Guru Bob Lines: 20