Article View: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Article #2616Re: Opinions on Microsoft QuickC for Windows?
From: Bill Whedon
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 22:00
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 22:00
19 lines
1417 bytes
1417 bytes
In article <1992Dec30.191610.3685@pony.Ingres.COM> bonobo@Ingres.COM (David Victor) writes: >Has anyone out there had much experience with QuickC for Windows? I was >just wondering if I could get an opinion as to its usefulness. Are there >other CASE tools which blow away QuickCase:W? > I use QCWIN for prototyping prior to full build under MSC/C++ 7.0, and have upgraded the QuickCase:W to the full product. There is no better prototyping setup I've found. There are CASE tools which are less expensive than Case:W, but none better, or, IMNSHO, even as good. The Borland crowd will, of course, disagree. That is their mission, and I respect it, if not their opinions, to which they are entitled. Actually, though, dollar for dollar, you won't get a better deal than QC with QC:W, no matter how hard you try. Bill Whedon whedon@netcom.com -- -- If I ain't programmin' I ain't awake! --
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec31.220017.20342@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!whedonReferences:
<1992Dec30.191610.3685@pony.Ingres.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!whedon From: whedon@netcom.com (Bill Whedon) Subject: Re: Opinions on Microsoft QuickC for Windows? Message-ID: <1992Dec31.220017.20342@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) References: <1992Dec30.191610.3685@pony.Ingres.COM> Distribution: na Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 22:00:17 GMT Lines: 23