Article View: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Article #2902Re: Tools to Debug UAE under Windows?
From: CADSI
Date: Wed, 29 May 1991 15:39
Date: Wed, 29 May 1991 15:39
19 lines
1504 bytes
1504 bytes
From article <1991May29.042848.27579@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, by ebergman@isis.cs.du.edu (Eric Bergman-Terrell): > > Are you saying that Codeview + Debugging Kernel are not satisfactory? The > reason I ask is that I'm tempted to buy the SDK just for the debugging > kernel... > > If Codeview + Debugging Kernel aren't satisfactory, please let me know why. > I have used them and still do. I find them satisfactory myself. This is gonna bring up LOTS of opinions. This is just one of 'em. There are many reasons to own the SDK. Debugging Kernels are just one. There are some other utilities that are real nice (Spy, Heapwalk, ...) |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| |Tom Hite | The views expressed by me | |Manager, Product development | are mine, not necessarily | |CADSI (Computer Aided Design Software Inc. | the views of CADSI. | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991May29.153911.10856@ccad.uiowa.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!ns-mx!ccad.uiowa.edu!cadsiReferences:
<1991May29.042848.27579@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!ns-mx!ccad.uiowa.edu!cadsi From: cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer Subject: Re: Tools to Debug UAE under Windows? Message-ID: <1991May29.153911.10856@ccad.uiowa.edu> Date: 29 May 91 15:39:11 GMT Article-I.D.: ccad.1991May29.153911.10856 References: <1991May29.042848.27579@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> Distribution: usa Organization: CAD-Research, U. of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa Lines: 19