Article View: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Article #341Re: SDK 3.1
From: Donald Doherty
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 21:39
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 21:39
32 lines
1713 bytes
1713 bytes
In article <1992Apr13.100123.6976@news.cs.indiana.edu> guthrie@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (Stephen Guthrie) writes: > > Has anyone paid the $150 for the SDK 3.1 manuals? > Was is worth it? Necessary? > > Also, does anyone know if it is necessary to buy the MME SDK to > program multimedia apps in Windows 3.1, or does the SDK and C 7.0 > combo have the necessary files? > > If the MME SDK is necessary, is it compatible with Windows 3.1, or > there an upgrade for it also? > I haven't seen the manuals yet but I beta tested without them. There is a lot of online help so they shouldn't be necessary (although I will probably order them anyway since I like docs :^) ). SDK 3.1 contains all you need to program multi-media at a low level (i.e. C code). I don't know the differences between what you get with SDK 3.1 and the new MME SDK since I've never used the latter. Presumably various high level tools. Don ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Donald Doherty Dept. of Psychobiology Email: ddoherty@ics.uci.edu University of California CompuServe: 76646,1321 Irvine, CA 92717-4550 FAX: (714) 725-2447 U.S.A. Voice: (714) 856-1776
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<29E9FFAB.18123@ics.uci.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!ucivax!ddohertyReferences:
<1992Apr13.100123.6976@news.cs.indiana.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!ucivax!ddoherty From: ddoherty@ics.uci.edu (Donald Doherty) Subject: Re: SDK 3.1 Message-ID: <29E9FFAB.18123@ics.uci.edu> Keywords: SDK Reply-To: ddoherty@ics.uci.edu (Donald Doherty) Organization: Univ. of Calif., Irvine, Info. & Computer Sci. Dept. References: <1992Apr13.100123.6976@news.cs.indiana.edu> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 21:39:55 GMT Lines: 33