Article View: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Article #1989Re: BC++ vs C6/SDK
From: John Munsch
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1991 17:13
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1991 17:13
23 lines
1474 bytes
1474 bytes
In article <1991Apr4.091431.26337@qut.edu.au> drift@qut.edu.au (Glenn Wallace) writes: >We have about 10-15 people working on development of one package using >C6 and SDK. I haven't seen BC++ in the flesh yet, but I doubt it is going >to be robust enough to _seriously_ use. Most of the negative comments I've seen directed at it indicate a large number of people who are very new at programming Windows. A lot of the problems that people are having are the exact same ones they would have under MSC & the SDK but they are reporting them as Borland problems. >Is there anyone using BC++ for "finished product" type development, or >only tinkering? We are most certainly using Borland for all our current work and I expect it to become our "official" compiler very soon. >Glenn "I shall remember to EXPORT EXPORT EXPORT my DlgProcs" ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ You wouldn't have to if you used Smart Callbacks under BC++. John Munsch "I do not tinker :-)"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<28737@spudge.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!evax!utacfd!merch!rwsys!spudge!johnmReferences:
<1991Apr4.091431.26337@qut.edu.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!evax!utacfd!merch!rwsys!spudge!johnm From: johnm@spudge.UUCP (John Munsch) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer Subject: Re: BC++ vs C6/SDK Message-ID: <28737@spudge.UUCP> Date: 5 Apr 91 17:13:40 GMT References: <1991Apr4.091431.26337@qut.edu.au> Reply-To: johnm@spudge.UUCP (John Munsch) Organization: Friends of Guru Bob Lines: 23