🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Article #1641

Borland C++ vs Microsoft C 5.10

#1641
From: Mark Boyd
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1991 23:46
13 lines
813 bytes
The company I work at has a large Windows program.  We just got Borland C++
and made the necessary conversions and compiled it.  The size differences are
quite surprising.

   Microsoft C 5.1 .EXE:  720672 bytes
       Borland C++ .EXE:  842848 bytes

The optimization for Microsoft is -Os for space.  The optimization for Borland
is all but -Z (aliasing).  I'm interested in knowing what everyone else is
seeing.

Mark Boyd
Inter-Tel, Inc.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <350@intertel.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!intertel!boyd_m

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!intertel!boyd_m
From: boyd_m@intertel.UUCP (Mark Boyd)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: Borland C++ vs Microsoft C 5.10
Keywords: windows borland microsoft
Message-ID: <350@intertel.UUCP>
Date: 13 Mar 91 23:46:07 GMT
Organization: Inter-Tel, Inc., Chandler, AZ
Lines: 13