Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #109Re: Windows Future
From: Wayne Jefferson Doust
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 04:38
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 04:38
13 lines
1002 bytes
1002 bytes
mikew@hpwarha.wal.hp.com (Michael Williams) writes: >Personally, I welcome the development of an integrated Program and File >Manager, but I see no technical reason that Microsoft couldn't retain One of the big problems is that you have to store the icon info and other info somewhere. You can't store them inside the dos programme so you have to store them somewhere else. My guess is that MS is consciously avoiding this problem to help the migration to windows NT. To me thta would be a BIG drawcard - having only a system manager or whatever that does the lot. Wayne
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul27.043832.15349@cc.uow.edu.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!cs.uow.edu.au!cc.uow.edu.au!u8515682References:
<1992Jul10.175408.19142@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> <3422@hpwala.wal.hp.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!cs.uow.edu.au!cc.uow.edu.au!u8515682 From: u8515682@cc.uow.edu.au (Wayne Jefferson Doust) Subject: Re: Windows Future Message-ID: <1992Jul27.043832.15349@cc.uow.edu.au> Organization: University Of Wollongong References: <1992Jul10.175408.19142@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> <3422@hpwala.wal.hp.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 04:38:32 GMT Lines: 13