🚀 go-pugleaf

From article <1991Apr29.150159.12586@wam.umd.edu>, by harold@wam.umd.edu (James B. Harold):
> In article <1991Apr27.155636.5769@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> mroussel@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Marc Roussel) writes:
>>In article <3116@s5.Morgan.COM> joec@Morgan.COM (Joe Collins) writes:
>>>In article <1991Apr26.004923.8553@int13.hf.intel.com> tim@int13.hf.intel.com
>>>(Timothy E. Forsyth) writes:
>>>>lruppert@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Prometheus) writes:

[ stuff deleted]


>>>>>Does anyone know of a good WYSIWYG Word Processor for Windows?

[ stuff deleted]

> 
>    I've been using Ami for several months now and quite like it.     

[ more deletions ]
>>                            WfW is an excellent choice if you have heavy
>>duty text processing needs but your graphical needs are restricted to
>>importing graphics from other programs.


I have both programs and neither fulfill the request.  The initial request
was for WYSIWIG.  At best, both programs (like ALL Windows codes) are
WYSIWYSOg (what you see is what youll Sort Of get).  The font informatinon
shown on screen is not at all accurate.  Untill the TrueFont stuff
is part of a Windows release, WYSIWIG ain't available in Windows.

|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Tom Hite					|  The views expressed by me |
|Manager, Product development			|  are mine, not necessarily |
|CADSI (Computer Aided Design Software Inc.	|  the views of CADSI.       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|