Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #11483Re: WYSIWYG Word Processor for Windows 3.0?
From: Kurt Van Schalkwijk
Date: Thu, 02 May 1991 19:58
Date: Thu, 02 May 1991 19:58
12 lines
955 bytes
955 bytes
In article <1991May1.045558.29716@leland.Stanford.EDU> elmanad@leland.Stanford.EDU (Adam Elman) writes: > WYSIWIG, by your definition, isn't available on a PC (and likely won't > be even with TrueType if you're going to be picky about it). If you > want your definition of WYSIWIG, go buy a NeXT -- Display PostScript > is the only way you'll get what you really want. As far as I can tell from the output, GEOWORKS Ensemble is WYSIWYG Blue dogs in the sky... They're eating up my brain!!!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<11122@bunny.GTE.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!ccncsu!purdue!news.cs.indiana.edu!samsung!usc!wuarchive!hsdndev!bunny!bunny.gte.com!kcv0Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!ccncsu!purdue!news.cs.indiana.edu!samsung!usc!wuarchive!hsdndev!bunny!bunny.gte.com!kcv0 From: kcv0@bunny.gte.com (Kurt Van Schalkwijk) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: WYSIWYG Word Processor for Windows 3.0? Message-ID: <11122@bunny.GTE.COM> Date: 2 May 91 19:58:58 GMT Sender: news@gte.com Organization: GTEL Lines: 12