Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #11678Re: OS/2 2.0 is here! vs Windows 3.0 vs NeXT/MACH
From: Kent Forschmiedt
Date: Thu, 09 May 1991 18:36
Date: Thu, 09 May 1991 18:36
12 lines
1131 bytes
1131 bytes
I have been half following this thread, and if this question has been addressed, I missed it. I am a Win3 developer, and I am interested in OS/2 as a more stable platform upon which to do my work. Windows' use of a single LDT renders it very vulnerable to wild pointers, and the debugging kernel does not generally recover from a crashed application. Does OS/2 2.0 provide the support that the SDK kernel provides? Can I run CodeView for Windows under OS/2? -- Kent Forschmiedt ... kentfo@polari ... uw-beaver!sumax!polari!kentfo
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4020@polari.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!mips!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!milton!sumax!polari!kentfoReferences:
<1991May7.164109.13128@amd.com> <-47gvh+@rpi.edu> <1991May08.011359.12322@comp.vuw.ac.nz>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!mips!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!milton!sumax!polari!kentfo From: kentfo@polari.UUCP (Kent Forschmiedt) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.windows.ms.programmer Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 is here! vs Windows 3.0 vs NeXT/MACH Message-ID: <4020@polari.UUCP> Date: 9 May 91 18:36:41 GMT References: <1991May7.164109.13128@amd.com> <-47gvh+@rpi.edu> <1991May08.011359.12322@comp.vuw.ac.nz> Organization: Seattle Online Public Unix (206) 328-4944 Lines: 12