Re: Has anyone used a NEC-4D with Win3.0 and 1024x768?

Article View: comp.windows.ms

Article #11765

#11765

From: Tom Neff
Date: Sat, 11 May 1991 05:10

13 lines
1151 bytes

In article <1991May10.145422.7897@potomac.ads.com> jclose@potomac.ads.com (Jeff Close) writes:
>I'm considering getting a NEC Multi. 4D for use with Windows 
>under 1024 res.  I've got an Orchid ProII board.  Has anyone
>used this combination, or any other board for that matter,
>and if so, have you had any problems?

It works great.  It's working now as I type this.  I use the Boca
instead of the Orchid but they're both ET4000.

The only thing I'll say is that if you decide to run the 1024x768 non
interlaced, you'll have to put up with >CLICK!< from the NEC whenever a
DOS app switched to full screen character mode, and back.  It's annoying
enough that I stick with interlaced just at the moment.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <64907089@bfmny0.BFM.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!bfmny0!tneff

References: <91129.154120MXP122@psuvm.psu.edu> <1991May10.145422.7897@potomac.ads.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!bfmny0!tneff
From: tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Has anyone used a NEC-4D with Win3.0 and 1024x768?
Message-ID: <64907089@bfmny0.BFM.COM>
Date: 11 May 91 05:10:47 GMT
References: <91129.154120MXP122@psuvm.psu.edu> <1991May10.145422.7897@potomac.ads.com>
Reply-To: tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff)
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message