Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #12000re: Windows 3.0 on a 286
From: dworshak
Date: Sun, 19 May 1991 15:17
Date: Sun, 19 May 1991 15:17
13 lines
1092 bytes
1092 bytes
Regarding Windows 3.0 on a 286: I have a 286 with 1M of RAM and a 40MB hard drive, and have been using Win 3 for about 1 year now. Win 3 works fine by itself under 1M. If you plan to run any large applications, such as Word For Win or Excel, 1 MB isn't going to cut it. When running large applications, Win 3 starts to cache to disk very frequently, and overall performance is quite poor. The problem is made worse if you're also running ATM in the background. In my opinion, anyone buying a new system should get at *least* a 386sx. For those of us stuck with 286's however, Windows does seem to run adequately *if* given enough RAM. I don't know how much RAM is enough, but I would guess a minimum of 3 or 4 MB's.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991May19.111706.3172@coral.bucknell.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!psuvax1!coral.bucknell.edu!dworshakShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!psuvax1!coral.bucknell.edu!dworshak From: dworshak@coral.bucknell.edu Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: re: Windows 3.0 on a 286 Message-ID: <1991May19.111706.3172@coral.bucknell.edu> Date: 19 May 91 15:17:06 GMT Organization: Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA, USA Lines: 13