Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #12299ATM vs. Publisher's Powerpak
From: Ernest Chuang
Date: Tue, 28 May 1991 23:53
Date: Tue, 28 May 1991 23:53
9 lines
809 bytes
809 bytes
I don't know if this has already been hashed out before, but can someone give a comparison between ATM and Publisher's Powerpak? I'm currently using ATM, so I know what it can do; I guess I'm mainly interested in whether PP is significantly better, to make it worth switching to. Thanks! Ernest Chuang echuang@ocf.berkeley.edu echuang@cory.berkeley.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991May28.235322.17424@agate.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!rootShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!root From: echuang@ocf.berkeley.edu (Ernest Chuang) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: ATM vs. Publisher's Powerpak Message-ID: <1991May28.235322.17424@agate.berkeley.edu> Date: 28 May 91 23:53:22 GMT Article-I.D.: agate.1991May28.235322.17424 Sender: root@agate.berkeley.edu (Charlie Root) Distribution: usa Organization: ucb Lines: 9