Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #13133similar to FAQ but not exactly? COM4 slower than COM2
From: Marcus Daniels
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1991 02:59
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1991 02:59
15 lines
931 bytes
931 bytes
Procomm plus works okay when configured to COM1/2 (and built in COM1/2 disabled), but COM4 is too slow, why? Have tried XOFF and buffering options in SYSTEM.ini....but no luck. zmodem complains about data overruns. This is running at 2400 baud. it's a AST Prem II 386SX/20 (Mhz). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - marcus@eecs.ee.pdx.edu / ....!uunet!tektronix!psueea!eecs!marcus - "The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by those who don't have it"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2924@pdxgate.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!apple!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!zephyr.ens.tek.com!ogicse!pdxgate!eecs!marcusShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!apple!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!zephyr.ens.tek.com!ogicse!pdxgate!eecs!marcus From: marcus@eecs.cs.pdx.edu (Marcus Daniels) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: similar to FAQ but not exactly? COM4 slower than COM2 Message-ID: <2924@pdxgate.UUCP> Date: 26 Jun 91 02:59:31 GMT Sender: news@pdxgate.UUCP Lines: 15