Re: Stacker and Windows 3

Article View: comp.windows.ms

Article #13255

#13255

From: Tim Russell
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 1991 03:00

13 lines
1044 bytes

In article <1991Jun30.001334.16687@techbook.com> mihalik@techbook.com (Michael Mihalik) writes:
>Only thing that I can find negative is that YOU SHOULD NEVER TRY TO
>DEFRAG THE STACKER DRIVE.

    I've heard (and the manual says) that you CAN run one, but shouldn't.
It ends up fragmenting the stacker drive more.  I've also heard that Stac
is about to release their own defragmenter for stacker volumes.  That'd
certainly be nice!

-- 
____
\TR/   Tim Russell                          "Homo sum, et nihil humanum
 \/    russell@ursa-major.spdcc.com          a me alienum puto" - Terrence

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8151@spdcc.SPDCC.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!mintaka!spdcc!russell

References: <1991Jun26.041734.20046@minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au> <1991Jun30.001334.16687@techbook.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!mintaka!spdcc!russell
From: russell@spdcc.COM (Tim Russell)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Stacker and Windows 3
Message-ID: <8151@spdcc.SPDCC.COM>
Date: 1 Jul 91 03:00:06 GMT
References: <1991Jun26.041734.20046@minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au> <1991Jun30.001334.16687@techbook.com>
Distribution: comp
Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message