Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #14029Re: What about a Windows binaries group?
From: Roger Hadgraft
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1990 21:49
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1990 21:49
14 lines
1218 bytes
1218 bytes
In article <22948@usc.edu>, papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa) writes: > Forget about a comp.windows.ms.binaries or similar. The volume in > comp.windows.ms is so SMALL, that it is not even worth considering. Take > a look at the volume of the ibmpc, Mac and Amiga groups to get an idea > of what kind of volume makes a binaries and sources group feasable. > My 2c. > Is it worth posting binaries here? Or is everyone so concerned about viruses that that is unacceptable? -- Roger Hadgraft | hadgraft@civeng.monash.edu.au Lecturer in Civil Engineering | phone: +61 3 565 4983 Monash University | fax: +61 3 565 3409 Clayton, Vic. 3168. Australia. |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<16643.25e1049c@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!bruce!monu1!vaxc!cie590lReferences:
<16164.25d924c5@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au> <1227@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de> <22948@usc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!bruce!monu1!vaxc!cie590l From: hadgraft@civeng.monash.edu.au (Roger Hadgraft) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: What about a Windows binaries group? Message-ID: <16643.25e1049c@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au> Date: 19 Feb 90 21:49:32 GMT References: <16164.25d924c5@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au> <1227@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de> <22948@usc.edu> Organization: Civil Engineering, Monash University, Australia Lines: 14