🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1990Feb19.204659.15854@chinet.chi.il.us> patrickd@chinet.chi.il.us (Patrick Deupree) writes:
| In article <4311@daffy.cs.wisc.edu> schaut@cat9.cs.wisc.edu (Rick Schaut) writes:
| >Do you mean that the Whitewater Group _isn't_ a beta test site for Win3? :-).
| >
| Of course we're a beta site (I've been told I can say this).  @:-)
| (Big Brother is watching)

It's rather humerous talking about something that doesn't officially exist.
I just interviewed (first level) with MicroSoft, and we discussed some of
the problems people are having with Windows.  The only response I got, however,
was "Just wait for Win3."  It keeps me on the edge of my seat.

The funiest, though, is when you ask a developer if their product will run
under Win3.  The stock answer is "our product will work with any future
release of Windows."  Not even a mention of a version number when both the
inquisitor and the respondant know that the respondant has a copy of the
supposedly non-existent program in hand.

Batedly waiting for Win3,

--
Rick (schaut@garfield.cs.wisc.edu)

Peace and Prejudice Don't Mix! (unknown add copy)