🚀 go-pugleaf

>nt is not the only ukernel.

Yes, I know - I asked about Mach 3.0 as well.

>next is a ukernel implementation also.

Really?  I thought the original version of their OS, at least, was based
on Mach 2.x, with much of the kernel-type functionality (file systems,
for example) in the kernel rather than in servers.  Have they changed
that?

>nt is definitely ukernel and i think the kernel is less than 
>60k. everything else is implememented as dll.

Everything including putatively privileged subsystems such as the file
system(s)?  Or does that appear in servers, rather than in user-mode
dynamically-linked libraries.